- From: Philipp Hoschka <hoschka@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 07:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Kari Pihkala <kpihkala@cc.hut.fi>, www-smil@w3.org
Kari, the "repeat" test seems indeed to be wrong. The "fragement-id" test also shouldn't be there, since it tests a feature that was removed from SMIL 1.0 before it became a recommendation -Philipp --- Kari Pihkala <kpihkala@cc.hut.fi> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was going through the testcases for SMIL 1.0 > at http://smil.nist.gov/Testcase.html, and > found test repeat-infinite.smi to define an infinite > loop using repeat="0", instead of "indefinite": > > ... > <body> > <par repeat="0"> > ... > > Is this legal value for repeat? In SMIL 2.0 spec > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil20-20010807/smil-timing.html#Timing-repeatAttribute > for deprecated repeat attribute, it says the the > value should be > greater than 0. SMIL 1.0 spec doesn't say anything. > So, I assume the test > case is wrong? > > There was also a strange test for fragment-id > attribute in > fragment-id.smi. > > - Kari > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Philipp Hoschka wrote: > > > Talking about testsuites, there is actually also a > testsuite for > > SMIL 1.0. You can find it at > > > > http://smil.nist.gov/Testcase.html > > > > __________________________________________________ Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
Received on Friday, 14 September 2001 10:28:57 UTC