- From: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:56:01 -0400
- To: <alillich@adobe.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-validator@w3.org>
Regarding your note to the RDF Validator mail list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-validator/2002Jun/0022.html Given: <ns:prop2 rdf:parseType="Resource"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="type"/> <ns:attr>value"</ns:attr> </ns:prop2> and the resulting triples: 1 genid:46186 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type online:type 2 genid:46186 ns:test/attr value 3 online: ns:test/prop2 genid:46186 There are two questions - why is the object of triple #1: online:type instead of: type and why is the subject of triple #3: online: instead of an empty string. The Validator's use of "online:" has been debated before. It's an attempt to address the following part of M&S 1.0's section 6: [[ URI-References are resolved to resource identifiers by first resolving the URI-reference to absolute form as specified by [URI] using the base URI of the document in which the RDF statements appear. ]] This approach has been taken by other online RDF Validators (e.g. CARA). Another approach would be to use something like http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ as the root. Art Barstow ---
Received on Friday, 28 June 2002 12:57:06 UTC