- From: Adrian Walker <adrianw@snet.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:15:07 -0400
- To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, www-rdf-rules@w3.org, dreer@fh-furtwangen.de
Hi Ian & All --
At 03:29 PM 6/28/2005 +0100, you wrote:
>A fourth alternative, and one that I think several people in this
>thread have been arguing for, is to continue working (in whatever
>context) towards an architectural framework that provides for a better
>integration between First Order and LP based languages.
There's actually a more general proposed architectural framework on the table.
It seeks to federate existing commercial rules packages and forthcoming SW
rules languages, by means of loose, but human-meaningful, coupling.
The proposal is outlined in Section 2 of
http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/paper/19 .
Thanks in advance for thoughts about it.
-- Adrian
INTERNET BUSINESS LOGIC (R)
www.reengineeringllc.com
Adrian Walker
Reengineering LLC
PO Box 1412
Bristol
CT 06011-1412 USA
Phone: USA 860 583 9677
Cell: USA 860 830 2085
Fax: USA 860 314 1029
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 16:19:32 UTC