- From: Charlie Abela <charles.abela@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:16:36 +0200
- To: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5908cca0050623111648943898@mail.gmail.com>
This is quite an interesting thread though I also suggest that people take a look at the interesting work that the REWERSE guys are doing in relation to SW rule languages. http://www.rewerse.net Regards Charlie -------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Jim -- At 11:07 PM 6/22/2005 -0400, you wrote: >I spent many years of my career arguing against DL and doing scruffy AI - >yet here I am defending OWL - why? because the design time and fights >over the details of a number of use cases ended up creating something >pretty damn useful -- both in the OWL DL space and in the OWL Full space >-- so somehow the process worked... You make a good point. A lot of the practical work on SW rules (e.g. jena), and on related SQL-flavored langages, is still more scruffy than neat. A recent attempt to neatify some of it is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rule-workshop-discuss/2005Jun/att-0006/00-part Cheers, -- Adrian INTERNET BUSINESS LOGIC (R) www.reengineeringllc.com <http://www.reengineeringllc.com> Adrian Walker Reengineering LLC PO Box 1412 Bristol CT 06011-1412 USA Phone: USA 860 583 9677 Cell: USA 860 830 2085 Fax: USA 860 314 1029
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 18:29:47 UTC