W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-rules@w3.org > October 2004

Re: swrl.owl is OWL Full and Protege does not support OWL/XML

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:57:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20041014.175702.107684509.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: nvdesai@ncsu.edu
Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org

From: nvdesai@ncsu.edu
Subject: Re: swrl.owl is OWL Full and Protege does not support OWL/XML
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:21:06 -0400 (EDT)

> 
> Peter and Ian,
> 
> Thanks for clarifying your takes on this.
> 
> As most of the tools use Jena for parsing purposes, its Jena that will
> need an update to handle OWL XML in  case of deprecation.
> 
> Till then, swrl.owl is the only option to develop something serious.

I remain puzzled as to how swrl.owl even plays into the Jena parsing
situation.  It is not as if swrl.owl defines the semantics or even the
syntax of SWRL. 

> BTW, is a new version of SWRL/SWRLX due anytime soon ? 

Probably not, i.e., no.  :-)

> Is there a page
> where users can track the activities ?

http://www.daml.org/rules/ is the most authoritative page on SWRL

> thanks again,
> 
> -Nirmit

peter
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 21:50:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:46:18 UTC