- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:15:08 +0000
- To: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
A couple of remarks about the RDF Concrete Syntax as described in [1]. The examples given in section 6.1 don't seem to correspond with the schema presented at [2]. They use <swrl:individualPropertyAtom> and <swrl:classAtom> rather than: <swrl:IndividualPropertyAtom> and <swrl:ClassAtom> (e.g. capitalisation is inconsistent). Also the examples use <ruleml:Imp> rather than <swrl:Impl> for the rules and <ruleml:head> and <ruleml:body> rather than <swrl:head> and <swrl:body>. This is somewhat ambiguous anyway as the context of the examples isn't given (so we don't actually know what the namespaces resolve to), but it's confusing at best. In fact [2] defines ruleml as an entity and namespace, but then never goes on to use it which seems a little strange. Cheers, Sean [1] http://www.daml.org/2003/11/swrl/ [2] http://www.daml.org/2003/11/swrl/swrl.owl -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 11:15:41 UTC