- From: Wagner, G.R. <G.R.Wagner@tm.tue.nl>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:00:42 +0200
- To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-rules@w3.org>
>> SWRL assigns a different meaning to documents written in RDF/XML than that >> provided by the RDF model theory. > > Which of course means they are not written in RDF/XML, right? No, they are written in RDF/XML (syntax), but they are not RDF documents. This is like using the language of classical predicate logic, but assigning a non-classical (e.g. intui- tionistic) semantics -Gerd
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2004 05:01:35 UTC