- From: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 14:40:48 +0100
- To: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> writes: > My discussion about abstraction was, in part, extrapolating from my > perception of the relationship between XPath and XQuery, where XPath > provides low-level access to the underlying syntax of an XML document, and > XQuery builds upon that. That's the way I've been thinking, and the reason I used Saxon, since I got an XSLT implementation as well. It's possible that if I move TreeHugger to Saxon 7 I'll get XQuery as well, but that's something for the future, since I haven't really looked at XQuery properly. Damian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/> iD8DBQE/WJJgAyLCB+mTtykRAs8YAJ0a4RyyU3mcCZ9fq8Kflu0CiJNqkQCfZaE/ uHWGNlZEJ7JIY8N5UbBtTDQ= =cn0l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 09:40:50 UTC