- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 22:38:51 +0200
- To: Andy_Seaborne@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: "'www-rdf-rules@w3.org'" <www-rdf-rules@w3.org>, www-rdf-rules-request@w3.org
I understand the remarks and am quite biased by experiments using proof stuff... (will try to run different variants... when?) -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ "Seaborne, Andy" <Andy_Seaborne@hplb.h To: "'www-rdf-rules@w3.org'" <www-rdf-rules@w3.org> pl.hp.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: Vocabulary for RDF Query Test Cases www-rdf-rules-request @w3.org 2003-03-31 02:18 PM Jos, While N3 formulae could be used, I wanted a vocabulary that is just RDF. I quoted variables by using a property to their name. One thing formulae would be good for would be the form of query results which were a sequence of matching subgraphs: ( {:rec010 :year 2001; :month "May"; :city "Tel Aviv" :film "Pokemon 2"; :cinema "Globus". } { :rec017 :year 2001; :month "May"; :city "Jerusalem"; :cinema "Globus"; :film "A Hard Day's Night". } ) The other thought that occurred to me, from you example, is just to have: { ?r = :rec010. ?f = "Pokemon 2". ?c = "Tel Aviv" . } => { :rec010 :year 2001; :month "May"; :city "Tel Aviv" :film "Pokemon 2"; :cinema "Globus". } Andy -----Original Message----- From: Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo@agfa.com] Sent: 29 March 2003 21:13 To: Alberto Reggiori <alberto Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org Subject: Re: Vocabulary for RDF Query Test Cases > As a follow up of the IRC meetings [1][2] and the RDF query testcases > vocabularies announcement [3] , I have written up details of those > vocabularies into a document and put it (thanks to DanBri) on the > "RDF Query (and Rules) Testcases" site [4]: > > http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdfqr-tests/rdf-query-testcases.html > > This is work in progress; the document is a working document for people > to comment on by emailing this list. The above work is also related to > the other working document written by Andy Seaborne about "Recording > Query Results" [5] > > Alberto > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-rules/2003Feb/0014.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-rules/2003Mar/0015.html > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-rules/2003Mar/0013.html > [4] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdfqr-tests/ > [5] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdfqr-tests/recording-query-results.html Looks like good progress! (sorry I missed the IRC meeting but I had no free time) In http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdfqr-tests/recording-query-results.html reification is mentioned which is indeed maybe *not* the way to go... On the other hand I very much like the N3 way of writing subgraphs using {} notation. For instance given the facts in http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/ziv.n3 we can query those facts with http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/ziv-query.n3 and that is then resulting in http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/ziv-result.n3 so the query looks like ?r :year 2001; :month "May"; :city ?c; :film ?f; :cinema "Globus". and a particular result looks like {?r = :rec010. ?r :year 2001} => {:rec010 :year 2001}. {?r = :rec010. ?r :month "May"} => {:rec010 :month "May"}. {?r = :rec010. ?c = "Tel Aviv". ?r :city ?c} => {:rec010 :city "Tel Aviv"}. {?r = :rec010. ?f = "Pokemon 2". ?r :film ?f} => {:rec010 :film "Pokemon 2"}. {?r = :rec010. ?r :cinema "Globus"} => {:rec010 :cinema "Globus"}. but that can be further improved (just wanted to show the braces) -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ PS I also had a look to Andy's Joseki and like/follow it's very nifty combination of HTTP and N3 Triples
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2003 16:43:47 UTC