- From: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:04:31 -0500
- To: "'Jos De_Roo'" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Cc: "'RDF Rules'" <www-rdf-rules@w3.org>
Hi Jos, It looks to me like the rules for neg:item (rule40n2) in [1] make a unique names assumption. Is this by design? Should: ?a log:notEqualTo ?x be changed to: ?a owl:differentFrom ?x or am I misinterpreting the semantics of log:notEqualTo (i.e. does it do more than a name comparison)? Regards, Geoff [1] http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/owl-rules
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2003 08:09:06 UTC