- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue Sep 11 08:45:52 2001
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
> >I agree that RDF queries and RDF rule premises > > Er.....actually, rule consequents/conclusions are more like queries > than rule premises are. Is that what you meant? Um, no. Here's a rule: If Ralph is in his office, then Ralph is at MIT. \ / \ / \ / \ / Premise Conclusion (Antecedent) (Consequent) We could make either part into a query: Is Ralph in his office? Is Ralph at MIT? But it seems much more natural to think of the premise as a query; it leads us to a very simple algorithm: query: Is Ralph in his office? on success: we can conclude Ralph is at MIT. on failure: we can't conclude anything from this. How else do you see it? -- sandro
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2001 08:45:52 UTC