- From: Stefan Decker <stefan@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:45:43 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, sandro@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
Because the RDF encoding allows to 1) Reuse the existing infrastructure 2) Allows to talk about the same objects in different languages 3) Have a (admittedly minimal) common understanding about the semantics (better than nothing) CU, Stefan At 10:25 AM 9/10/2001, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> >Subject: Re: What is an RDF Query? >Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:37:49 -0400 > > > Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > > > > > - use something else for variables. > > > > > > None of the query engines I have played with encode queries in > > > RDF. This frees them up to use whatever they want to encoded > > > variables. The problem is, naturally, there is little > > > interoperability. This limits not only the ability to use the same > > > query in different environments, but also the ability to make formal > > > assertions about queries and rules. > > > > Yep. This works, but it ends up more complicated than we need, if we > > just handle existential variables properly. > >I don't understand the need to encode everything in RDF. Encoding >everything in RDF ends up with a very complicated system, and most of the >semantic import will be in the encodings, which are not part of RDF. > >Peter F. Patel-Schneider >Bell Labs Research
Received on Monday, 10 September 2001 13:45:19 UTC