- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 11:11:49 -0700
- To: <www-rdf-rules@w3.org>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
From: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org> > Why use a logic language instead of, say, Java byte code? Java (as > slow as it is!) would certainly run faster. My guess is that the > right thing to do is both. Provide a logical formula which constrains > the behavior of a program, and allow any program to be run which is > proven (or claimed, in some circumstances) to meet those constraints. > Trivial programs, like date validation, could probably be handled by > an automated theorem prover. More complex ones written in a > conventional language and proven compliant with machine assistance. > But perhaps now I'm off in never-never land. That might be an interesting train of thought. There is nothing that prevents RDF graphs from including (and\or referencing) programs. If we develope this as a language, then we can make a graph become a dynamic thing that could be said to have behavior. The basic perdicament could be given by something like: http://robustai.net/mentography/interpertation.gif ... and a more detailed example http://robustai.net/mentography/interpertation2.gif ... here is shown an algorithm coded in RDF http://robustai.net/mentography/positiveInteger.gif ... another one showing the relationship between price of gold and the script to determing it http://robustai.net/mentography/PriceOfGold.gif The ~meaning~ of an RDF graph could then be said to be the behavior it entails :) Seth Russell
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 14:12:16 UTC