- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:48:43 +0200
- To: "Robert Mark Bram" <relaxedrob@optusnet.com.au>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
On 29.08.2004 12:29:58, Robert Mark Bram wrote: > >Hello, > >I thought that an RDF triple should always include "subject, verb and >object". > >But then I found this example about DAML that seems to miss the object.. > >== >http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro/ > >The second useful DAML construct that we shall go through is the >daml:UnambiguousProperty class. Saying that a Property is a >daml:UnambiguousProperty means that if the object of the property is the >same, then the subjects are equivalent. For example:- > >foaf:mbox rdf:type daml:UnambiguousProperty . >:x foaf:mbox . >:y foaf:mbox . >== > >How are these two allowed to miss the object? heh, here is what might be the *source* of the problem: <pre>foaf:mbox rdf:type daml:UnambiguousProperty . :x foaf:mbox <mailto:x@xyz.org> . :y foaf:mbox <mailto:x@xyz.org> .</pre> ;) benjamin -- Benjamin Nowack Kruppstr. 100 45145 Essen, Germany http://www.appmosphere.com/ >Any advice would be most welcome! > >Rob >:) > > > >-- >Robert Mark Bram >B.Comp.(Systems Development/Business Systems) >B.Net.Comp.(Hons) >Doctor of Philosophy Student > >School of Network Computing >Faculty of Information Technology >Monash University >Peninsula Campus >McMahons Rd >Frankston, VIC 3199 >AUSTRALIA > >Phone: 61 3 9904 4394 >Facsimile: 61 3 9904 4124 >Email: robert.mark.bram@infotech.monash.edu.au > > > > >
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 07:49:00 UTC