- From: Robert Mark Bram <relaxedrob@optusnet.com.au>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:29:58 +1000
- To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Hello, I thought that an RDF triple should always include "subject, verb and object". But then I found this example about DAML that seems to miss the object.. == http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro/ The second useful DAML construct that we shall go through is the daml:UnambiguousProperty class. Saying that a Property is a daml:UnambiguousProperty means that if the object of the property is the same, then the subjects are equivalent. For example:- foaf:mbox rdf:type daml:UnambiguousProperty . :x foaf:mbox . :y foaf:mbox . == How are these two allowed to miss the object? Any advice would be most welcome! Rob :) -- Robert Mark Bram B.Comp.(Systems Development/Business Systems) B.Net.Comp.(Hons) Doctor of Philosophy Student School of Network Computing Faculty of Information Technology Monash University Peninsula Campus McMahons Rd Frankston, VIC 3199 AUSTRALIA Phone: 61 3 9904 4394 Facsimile: 61 3 9904 4124 Email: robert.mark.bram@infotech.monash.edu.au
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2004 02:55:51 UTC