- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:01:31 +0200
- To: Seth Ladd <seth@picklematrix.net>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
On 14.04.2004 07:52:17, Seth Ladd wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>Forgive me if this isn't the right place to ask Euler questions, but I
>haven't been able to find a mailing list or contact for Euler. If there
>is a better place, please let me know.
>
>I am trying to write some tests using owl:hasValue and run it through
>Euler. Unfornately, I'm not having much luck. I am trying say "any
>object that has a property "dc:subject" and a value of "foo" is an
>instance of a :Foo class". I do it with:
>
>:Foo a owl:Class ;
> rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ;
> owl:onProperty dc:subject ;
> owl:hasValue^^xsd:string "foo" ] .
>
>I then give it the facts:
>
>:foo a owl:Thing ; dc:subject^^xsd:string "foo" .
>dc:subject a owl:DatatypeProperty ; rdfs:range xsd:string .
>
>Then I ask:
>
>_:X a :Foo .
>
>But I don't get any proofs. Of course, I could be asking the question
>incorrectly. Before I go down that route, I want to see if anyone knows
>if Euler can handle the above owl:hasValue usage.
hi seth,
your class description above says that any instance of Foo will
have at least one dc:subject value "foo". that's the other way round
and not what you intended, I guess (i.e. there still can be non-Foo
individuals with a dc:subject of "foo"). Euler could (if owl stuff is
supported) infer class membership if Foo was described as a complete
class via an owl:equivalentClass construct:
<owl:Class rdf:ID="Foo">
<owl:equivalentClass>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="&dc;subject"/>
<owl:hasValue rdf:datatype="&xsd;string">foo</owl:hasValue>
</owl:Restriction>
</owl:equivalentClass>
</owl:Class>
>
>Thanks for your tips or ideas!
>Seth
hope that helps.
best,
benjamin
--
Benjamin Nowack
Kruppstr. 82-100
45145 Essen, Germany
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 07:45:13 UTC