Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes

On 2002-06-24 20:58, "ext Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org> wrote:


> The past version of the RDF MT WD discussed 'asserted triples' with the
> implication that 'unasserted triples' might also exist. This language was
> removed in the current WD, so we must conclude that the current intention of
> the current RDF MT WD is that RDF reification in fact is not an acceptable
> means of representing an 'unasserted triple'. If I am incorrect, the RDF MT
> should state this relationship -- that is the purpose of a model theory,
> isn't it?

I agree. The MT would need to be tweaked to provide a resonable
treatment of reification with regards to expressing unasserted
triples, so as to provide for layering.

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 03:28:36 UTC