RE: properties as nodes etc.

>A way to view this is that where the node identifiers in a triple are
>instance identifers, the arc identifier is a *type* identifier, and the
>graph arc can be viewed as an *instance* of the type thus identified.
>
>To echo Seth's comment, then, the arc is not identified by the arc label
>alone;  it might be viewed as being identified by the combination of two
>endpoint nodes AND the arc label.

Thanks Graham, very clearly put.

So in principle at least then, it may be possible to make statements about
the arc instance, if this were identified by means of the attached nodes -
an odd sort of {URIa & URIb} identifier. Hmm - but what happens if there are
two arcs of the same type between node a and b (which I *think* would be
legal). bArcs anyone?

As far as my app goes, I'm just going to forget about this angle for now ;-)

Cheers,
Danny.

Received on Saturday, 22 June 2002 14:52:15 UTC