- From: Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 21:27:26 -0400
- To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
[Piotr Kaminski] > > From: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net> > > http://robustai.net/mentography/arity.gif > > Shouldn't the links between f and BinaryRelation and g and TernaryRelation > be instanceOf, not subClassOf? They are examples of specific kinds of > relations (instances), not a kind of binary/ternary relation. > I think it is really the entire subgraph of the relation that is the instance, not just the link. The subgraph is an instance of the template, which is a subclass of a more general class. Cheers, Tom P
Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 21:26:37 UTC