Re: properties as nodes etc.

[Piotr Kaminski]
>
> From: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>
> > http://robustai.net/mentography/arity.gif
>
> Shouldn't the links between f and BinaryRelation and g and TernaryRelation
> be instanceOf, not subClassOf?  They are examples of specific kinds of
> relations (instances), not a kind of binary/ternary relation.
>

I think it is really the entire subgraph of the relation that is the
instance, not just the link.  The subgraph is an instance of the template,
which is a subclass of a more general class.

Cheers,

Tom P

Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 21:26:37 UTC