- From: Piotr Kaminski <piotr@ideanest.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 16:33:11 -0700
- To: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
From: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>
> http://robustai.net/mentography/arity.gif
Shouldn't the links between f and BinaryRelation and g and TernaryRelation
be instanceOf, not subClassOf? They are examples of specific kinds of
relations (instances), not a kind of binary/ternary relation.
-- P.
--
Piotr Kaminski <piotr@ideanest.com> http://www.ideanest.com
It's the heart afraid of breaking that never learns to dance
Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 20:01:17 UTC