RE: Reification quoting in RDF/N3 from Graham Klyne on 2001-01-19 (www-rdf-logic@w3.org from January 2001)

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:29:32 +0000
To: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
Cc: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@w3.org>, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010119121952.03f8d590@pop3.connectfree.uk.com>

At 09:45 AM 1/19/01 +0000, Bill dehOra wrote:
>:Do not start writing things about string literals,
>:because it doesn't mean anything: write about URIs, please :-)
>
>Well we have to articulate something about them, they're a normative aspect
>of the M&S after all.

Well, there's always the data: URL.

Also, RDFS recognizes rdfs:Literal as an RDF class.

I think clarification rather than invention may be called for.  Something 
for RDF-IG?  I note this doesn't seem to be mentioned at Dan's RDF issues 
page (http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/).

#g

Received on Friday, 19 January 2001 08:14:33 UTC