- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:51:12 -0700
- To: "Peter Crowther" <Peter.Crowther@melandra.com>, "'Danny Ayers'" <danny@panlanka.net>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
From: "Peter Crowther" <Peter.Crowther@melandra.com>
> > From: Danny Ayers [mailto:danny@panlanka.net]
> > Can you give me an example of a model that *can* be used to
> > capture the meaning?
>
> http://www.daml.org/2001/03/model-theoretic-semantics.html, amongst
others.
Let me stick my neck out here again: I doubt that any useful meaning will
be captured until we can deal with the discourse level of interaction. Yet
I don't hear any discourse concepts being discussed here or at the DAML
site. My view is that the concept of meaning does not even emerge without
some kind of interaction between agents. I doubt that I am alone in holding
that view .. ... perhaps someone else will provide some authorities
references.
language: Semenglish
Seth
(wants to show you the following diagrams for purposes of discussion)
http://robustai.net/mentography/CoherentExperience.gif ,
http://robustai.net/mentography/AxiomsOfSemWeb.gif ,
http://robustai.net/mentography/SemBrowser.gif ,
http://robustai.net/mentography/pentuples.gif ;
(is seeking collaboration on programming a ) Sembrowser.
Received on Monday, 9 April 2001 12:54:44 UTC