Re: Semantic mail

>I disagree with your thinking that email should be treated 
>differently than any other form of content  on the Internet.  Surely 
>it is the intended use that matters.
>When your email and my email get posted here...
>..they turn into web pages.  Are these pages not worthy of "tags" on 
>the grounds that they originated as mail?

Precisely. Once archived they become web pages, and then can be 
marked up, I agree. But the markup should be part of the archiving 
process, not the emailing process.

I consider email a private communication between people, primarily. 
Most of my emails are not a form of content on the internet, and I 
would not use email if they were. You may disagree with my thinking, 
but frankly I do not give a damn about your opinion. Let me take this 
opportunity of warning you that I consider any attempt by you or 
anyone else to access most of my emails to be a form of intrusive 
hacking, and I will take energetic steps to dissuade you from 
accessing them, including all legal electronic means to frustrate you 
should you attempt it. I wish that email could be routinely encrypted 
for privacy. As you say, it is intended use that matters. Most of my 
emails are private communications between individuals or small groups 
of people, so keep your nose out of my business.

Email to an archived site is a more public form of dissemination, but 
even there it seems to me that the primary responsibility for making 
the content publicly available should reside with the proprieter of 
the archive itself.

Pat Hayes

IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax

Received on Friday, 10 November 2000 06:41:26 UTC