- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:09:59 -0500
- To: Peter Seibel <peter@gigamonkeys.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, dave@dajobe.org
* Peter Seibel <peter@gigamonkeys.com> [2006-02-25 20:39-0800] > > I'm working on some code that has to deal with RDF in various ways. So > being a pedantic kind of guy I'm groveling through the specs and > trying to implement things to the letter of the law. And of course I > run into stuff that I can't quite make sense of, either because it > doesn't make sense or because I'm missing something. Is this a good > forum for asking questions from an implementor's perspective or is > there somewhere else where those questions would be more appropriate. This list is fine, though technically we've moved over to use the semantic-web@w3.org list nowadays; you'll find more active attention there I think. See http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/ for archives, and http://www.w3.org/Mail/Request for info on how to subscribe. > > -Peter > > P.S. As an example, at the moment I'm trying to understand where the > parent attribute used in various production rules of: > > <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Data-Model> > > comes from since none of the events are defined as having a parent > attribute. Not quite my corner of the specs, sorry. I'm cc:'ing Dave Beckett in case he has any insights. BTW if this turns out to be feedback on the specs themselves, there is another list, www-rdf-comments@w3.org which gets monitored (when we have an active working group) for errata etc. cheers, Dan > -- > Peter Seibel * peter@gigamonkeys.com > Gigamonkeys Consulting * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/ > Practical Common Lisp * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/ > >
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2006 15:10:02 UTC