RE: Application of RDF. Need a sanity Check

Hi Charles,

Thank you for your input.   It does look like a sensible application; it looks so sensible that we thought somebody must have been working on it already.  So far it seems that if we'd be pioneering on this particular application of RDF, which makes it a little bit unsettling...

BTW. I had posted to the newer list after I found out about it.

Thanks,

Leo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:chaals@opera.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 9:34 AM
> To: Leo Riener; www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Application of RDF. Need a sanity Check
> 
> Lro, note that this list has been mostly abandoned in favour of one that
> has a new name but the same purpose and people. semantic-web@w3.org
> 
> Anyway, this seems like a perfectly normal and sensible case for using
> RDF/OWL.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:47:40 +0200, Leo Riener <riener@portal.com> wrote:
> 
> > To start with, neither our product nor this specific use of RDF has
> > anything to do with W3;
> > it consists of a number of specialized, interconnected components
> > running on multiple hosts.
> >   Some configuration parameters in one component depend on, or have an
> > effect upon, other
> > components.  The end result would be a topology design tool (Protégé)
> > producing a
> > configuration description (RDF/OWL) that can be subsequently used to
> > deploy the processes,
> > monitor them, etc.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Charles McCathieNevile                      chaals@opera.com
>           hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
>          Web dreams are free:   http://www.opera.com/download

Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 19:10:26 UTC