- From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:29:39 -0400
- To: Pete Johnston <p.johnston@ukoln.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Sorry, Pete, that's my fault: a bad example due to a last-minute attempt at simplifying the problem. Here's a better example that's more related to one of our issues in serializing FOAF documents: =========== <div role="foaf:Person"> Ben Adida </div> =========== which would yield a triple: =========== _:div0 xhtml2:role foaf:Person . =========== -Ben On Oct 17, 2005, at 8:24 AM, Pete Johnston wrote: > Ben Adida wrote: > > >> Specifically, we're considering assigning a RDF property to the >> ROLE attribute in HTML, for example: >> ========== >> <div role="dcterms:abstract"> >> .... the summary of the document.... >> </div> >> ========== >> would yield a triple: >> ========== >> _:div0 xhtml2:role dcterms:abstract . >> ========== >> The question is, what should xhtml2:role be? Should it be simply >> rdf:type? Should it be xhtml2:role with no relationship to rdf:type? >> > > Given that DCMI defines dcterms:abstract (URI= http://purl.org/dc/ > terms/abstract) as a property not a class - i.e. it's use is > > document has-abstract summary > > rather than > > document is-a abstract > > - I don't think you want an rdf:type relationship (or subproperty > of rdf:type)? > > Or maybe you do, and the use of dcterms:abstract isn't a good > example of a typical value of the role attribute? > > >> How should we go about making this decision? Are there guidelines >> for subclassing rdf:type? >> > > Cheers > > Pete >
Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 16:30:01 UTC