- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 09:16:19 +0100
- To: Matt Halstead <matt.halstead@auckland.ac.nz>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Matt Halstead wrote: > The vcard rdf schema at URI http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0 is > invalid. The easiest way to look at the problems is by using the w3c > validator(http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/). Is there a more recent one > that should be referenced? The errors are not that hard to fix, but I > presume there needs to be some consensus on what to rename the duplicate > IDs to. They don't need renaming, they can refer to the same concept (it just has multiple types). The syntax can be fixed by changing the three duplicated rdf:IDs in lines 115-118 to rdf:abouts but leaving the URIs (and thus the RDF Model) unchanged. Also needs a default namespace declaration to clean up the other errors. If the schema itself were to change then, personally, I'd prefer to see a more radical clean up of the TELTYPES/ADRTYPES modeling. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2005 08:16:28 UTC