- From: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:06:21 +0000
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
"How many of those resources declare equivalence with other ones? And how many are actually used?" Good points. What are the best practices here w.r.t to stating equivalence or other relationships between vocabularies? 1. Ontology authors should define as many equivalence relationships as possible when writing a schema 2. Ontology authors should regularly update their schemas after identifying new equivalence relationships 3. Third-parties should be encouraged to publish RDFS that define equivalence relationships between vocabularies. 4. All of the above I'm guessing the answer is 4. But I'm wondering how much effort people are putting into 1, 2, and especially 3. With respect to the second question in the quote above: "how many are actually used?" is anyone regularly publishing figures from a Scutter or other application which indicates how often a term is used? I've seen occasional reports generated off the back of several scutters, but nothing regularly updated. (I've probably missed something...) Strikes me that such information would be extremely useful to create a feedback effect that would encourage adoption of some vocabularies. Cheers, L. -- http://www.ldodds.com/blog http://www.ldodds.com/ldodds.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:24:26 UTC