- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean+rss@infomesh.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:57:02 +0000
- To: rss-dev@yahoogroups.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hammond, Tony wrote: > I'm in no way against representing Classes/properties as such - as > long as it's done _consistently_ down the hierarchy (in XML). Consistency with RDF convention is a binary thing: either you follow that convention or you do not. Regardless of the fact that our use of a single capitalized RDF class is tantalizing, we have chosen to use entirely lowercase elements inside the capitalized root, and hence the XML convention. Note that RSS 1.0 followed the same principle, that of a capitalized root element and lowercase children, but that we've since dropped the inconsistent rdf:Seq. In other words, RSS 1.0 also mixed Class and class, but at least RSS 1.1 only does so at the root. Moreover, since the uptake of RSS 1.0 presumably wasn't hampered on the (purely aesthetic) shunning of class capitalization, we don't believe that it'll be an important factor in RSS 1.1 either. Thanks, -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 14:57:36 UTC