W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2005

Re: Exchange of Named RDF Graphs

From: Chris Purcell <cjp39@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:47:02 +0000
Cc: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni@wup.it>, Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3013DA36-5F4A-11D9-BA8A-000A957B97EE@cam.ac.uk>

> I can't think of any
> harmful side effects of treating that document identifier as being the
> same as the graph identifier, as the operational semantics of the
> document handling (GETting the thing over HTTP) will generally be
> orthogonal to the declarative semantics any graph-juggling system will
> be using.

One could just introduce a statement that clarifies this, of course.
< myGraph eg:representsGraphAt "http://example.com/some.rdf" >

Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 18:47:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:54 UTC