- From: Chris Purcell <cjp39@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:47:02 +0000
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni@wup.it>, Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> I can't think of any > harmful side effects of treating that document identifier as being the > same as the graph identifier, as the operational semantics of the > document handling (GETting the thing over HTTP) will generally be > orthogonal to the declarative semantics any graph-juggling system will > be using. One could just introduce a statement that clarifies this, of course. < myGraph eg:representsGraphAt "http://example.com/some.rdf" > Cheers, Chris
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 18:47:16 UTC