- From: Damian Steer <damian.steer@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:52:28 +0100
- To: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
- Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12 Oct 2004, at 22:42, DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote: >> Hmm. I guess you want the equivalent of: >> <description parsetype="xml"> > > How would parseType="xml" be different from parseType="Literal", or > was that > just an alternative name for the same thing that ended up not being > chosen? It's different because it's late and I wasn't concentrating ;-) Literal is what I meant, but my fingers thought they knew better. > thanks, > > Bob No problem. Glad you worked out what I intended :-) Damian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBbFIwAyLCB+mTtykRAvsSAJ99kQanjZ82v9WnNhB+QMpMR7hr7gCg+qrG YGbI/qcb6g8e17KAzt2CcXs= =vKfg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 21:53:24 UTC