- From: Hammond, Tony <T.Hammond@nature.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:07:27 +0100
- To: "'Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com'" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, leo@gnowsis.com, mdirector@iptc.org
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Message-ID: <125F7834E11A5741A7D79412EE3504F90CE559AA@UK1APPS2.nature.com>
Hi Patrick: One question, one observation. I thought the advantage of using fragments was that (after reconstruction of the original URI from the QName) one would have a natural means of addressing into an XML document (describing the schema) using XPointer methodology. Am I wrong in this? I note that you use the term URIref a la RFC 2396. -bis recognizes fragments as natural components of URIs. Don't you feel that URIref is a somewhat challenging concept - relating as it seems to an unrequited URI. ;) Tony But be very careful to ignore all those schemas which use URIrefs with fragment identifiers to denote vocabulary terms, including the official RDF schemas for RDF, RDFS, OWL, etc... ;-) ;-) ;-) Particularly good example schemas to emulate [1] are: <http://sw.nokia.com/schemas/general/VOC-1.0.rdf> http://sw.nokia.com/schemas/general/VOC-1.0.rdf <http://sw.nokia.com/schemas/nokia/FN-1.2.rdf> http://sw.nokia.com/schemas/nokia/FN-1.2.rdf <http://sw.nokia.com/schemas/nokia/MARS-3.1.rdf> http://sw.nokia.com/schemas/nokia/MARS-3.1.rdf Note the use of the VOC-1 vocabulary to define functionally significant sets of terms, including the ability to group terms by subvocabularies, which fully alleviates the need to pay any attentions whatsoever to any syntactic features employed by the RDF/XML serialization, namely XML namespaces. Also, note the benefit of using http: URIs (not URIrefs with fragment identifiers) to denote your vocabulary terms per the following real-world examples: ******************************************************************************** DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage mechanism. Neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or one of its agents. Please note that neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept any responsibility for viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or its agents by means of e-mail communication. Macmillan Publishers Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number 785998 Registered Office Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke RG21 6XS ********************************************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2004 10:22:30 UTC