RE: peer-to-peer schema models: "Users, not designers, create and communicate meaning."

here's one:

http://www.alvis.info/

It's pretty new, I think.

Libby

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Peter Mika wrote:

>
> Dear Jonathan,
>
> You might want to look at the recently concluded European SWAP (Semantic
> Web and Peer-to-peer) project [1] and one of the most visible results of
> the project, the Bibster system [2].
>
> Best,
> Peter
>
> [1] http://swap.semanticweb.org
> [2] http://bibster.semanticweb.org
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
>> Jonathan Chetwynd
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:25 PM
>> To: ivan@w3.org
>> Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
>> Subject: peer-to-peer schema models: "Users, not designers,
>> create and communicate meaning."
>>
>>
>>
>> Does anyone know of current peer-to-peer RDF projects?
>>
>> By this I am referring to projects where the RDF metacontent
>> or schema
>> is defined over time by users.
>> (some people might consider the CD labelling project of this type.)
>>
>> I've proposed this model for a number of projects including:
>> The WWAAC concept coding framework project
>> The CEN metadata for accessibility  project
>>
>> There may well be significant hurdles in adopting this approach,
>> however was inspired to request evidence of current successes by the
>> excellent: "Where the Action Is"  The foundations of embodied
>> interaction by Paul Dourish.
>> when after a particularly intractable and rambling passage he
>> announces:
>>
>> "Principle: Users, not designers, create and communicate meaning."
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Jonathan Chetwynd
>> http://www.peepo.co.uk     "It's easy to use"
>> irc://freenode/accessibility
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 23:41:54 UTC