- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:58:03 -0000
- To:
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, public-esw-thes@w3.org
> The technical problem is that using frag ids raises issues when you
> have a large set of terms and then try to efficiently GET a term's URI
> in order to receive a description (or if you would like to
> provide term
> descriptions at a term's URI).
Just to say that, as Dave Reynolds pointed out a little while ago on
public-esw-thes list, this is not necessarily true, as you can do things
like
http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/water#concept
http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/ice#concept
or
http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/water#Water
http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/ice#Ice
... see his posting at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Sep/0016.html
Not that I'm expressing any sort of opinion on whether hash or slash is best
;)
Al.
>
> >If this has been discussed to death before, please feel free
> to tell me
> >so and/or provide a pointer to such a discussion.
> one related thread ("pound sign vs. slash as final URI delimiter")
> starts at [1]
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2004Feb/0117.html
>
> regards,
> benjamin
>
> --
> Benjamin Nowack
>
> Kruppstr. 100
> 45145 Essen, Germany
> http://www.bnode.org/
>
> @ DERI Galway from 2004-10-01 to 2004-12-02
> http://www.deri.ie/
>
>
>
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Jeen
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 16:58:45 UTC