- From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen@aduna.biz>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:55:24 +0100
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- CC: A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: [snip] >>(2) If you do think it's worth adding something to SKOS Core, >>what's the >>best idea for a local name? > > > Anything without a fragment identifier ;-) I realize I'm probably opening up a can of worms of the 'Holy War' brand here, but what exactly is the problem with using fragment identifiers? It seems to me that this is more a matter of esthetics/taste than anything else, there doesn't seem to be much of a technical difference between the two. If this has been discussed to death before, please feel free to tell me so and/or provide a pointer to such a discussion. Cheers, Jeen
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 10:56:32 UTC