- From: Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 17:49:05 +0300
- To: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Cc: "www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jon Hanna wrote: | To make it absolutely equivalent to rdf:Bag then you would want | to have the rdfs:subClassOf going in both directions: | | C1 rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Bag | rdf:Bag rdfs:subClassOf C1. | |>or woud it be possible to create such that one class is the equivalent of |>the collection using OWL. | | C1 owl:sameAs rdf:Bag. C1 owl:equivalentClass rdf:Bag would have the same effect as the subClassOf going in both directions. C1 owl:sameAs rdf:Bag would have the effect that *all* triples that are true about rdf:Bag are true about C1, which is different (with owl:equivalentClass, basically only the rdf:type triples in which C1/rdf:Bag are the object will be the same) (and a few others, like subClassOf triples, and triples with a property that is a subproperty of rdf:type, but that's like nitpicking ;) ). - - Benja -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAmlBhUvR5J6wSKPMRAtxsAJ4n/a+D5R0/2OVFCdm+NgBKNf0jXgCfVcws 0+cfN7gJ+LGcAAuCKlRkGCs= =fdoy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 10:49:50 UTC