- From: Kianoush Eshaghi <Kianoush.Eshaghi@metadat.at>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:13:30 +0200
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> 2. A Property would own multiple domains and rangs. It would like such > as following: > > <rdf:Property rdf:about="a"> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#A"/> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#B"/> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#C"/> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#D"/> > ... > ... > </rdf:Property> And this, but it probably doesnt mean what you think it does. It would make anything that was in the domain of 'a' a member of #A and #C. My RDF Schema should assert that the domain of 'a' must contain only members of #A and #C, and the range of 'a' must contain only members of #B and #D. > 3. I define some relationships between resources via rdfs:Property. > > I like to know, wether RDF Schema should accept transitive closure, what > there is in mathematics such as X ~ Y AND Y~Z ----> X ~Z (transitive). > (if RDF accepts multiple domains and rangs) For example: No, you need to go to OWL for that. i.e. I can use the RDF Schema without solicitude that this transitive effect will NOT occur. Eshaghi
Received on Friday, 11 June 2004 06:13:30 UTC