- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:42:38 +0100
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:27:36 +0200, Kianoush Eshaghi wrote: > 1. A Class would own multiple superclasses. It would like such as > following. > > <rdfs:Class rdf:about="A"> > <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#B"/> > <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#C"/> > </rdfs:Class> You have always been able to do this AFAIK. > 2. A Property would own multiple domains and rangs. It would like such > as following: > > <rdf:Property rdf:about="a"> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#A"/> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#B"/> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#C"/> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#D"/> > ... > ... > </rdf:Property> And this, but it probably doesnt mean what you think it does. It would make anything that was in the domain of 'a' a member of #A and #C. > 3. I define some relationships between resources via rdfs:Property. > > I like to know, wether RDF Schema should accept transitive closure, what > there is in mathematics such as X ~ Y AND Y~Z ----> X ~Z (transitive). > (if RDF accepts multiple domains and rangs) For example: No, you need to go to OWL for that. - Steve
Received on Friday, 11 June 2004 05:42:42 UTC