- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 20:39:06 +0200
- To: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Benjamin Nowack wrote: >On 10.06.2004 17:49:21, Danny Ayers wrote: > > >>Benjamin Nowack wrote: >> >> >> >>>On 10.06.2004 13:37:41, Danny Ayers wrote: >>>... >>> >>> >>>I think the specs are quite clear, the reference for example says: >>>[[ >>> "In OWL Lite and OWL DL, owl:Class must be used for all class >>> descriptions" >>>]] >>> >>> >>> >>But that doesn't exclude the use of rdfs:Class as well, nor does it >>explain *why*. In fact the very next point in the reference says: >> >> >I read, it _does_ exclude the use of rdfs:Class, for you would have >a class description that used rdfs:Class then. > > Ok, my mistake, on re-reading I do get it that way. Earlier I read 'class descriptions' as being the descriptions of the classes, which might include other characteristics such as other types. >>>Did you already try your example on e.g. protege's OWL >>>plug-in? >>> >>> >>> >>Not yet, I shall (I've got it set up with RACER here). >> >> >hm, I just remember, I'm not sure if the owl plug-in allows the >import of rdfs classes. but it's worth a try.. > > No joy, but I can't be 100% sure the problem wasn't just my (fragile) install. >cheerio to italy. > > grazie und guten abend, Danny. -- Raw http://dannyayers.com
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2004 14:52:38 UTC