- From: Richard <listserve@richardlennox.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 14:33:31 +0100
- To: Pete Johnston <p.johnston@ukoln.ac.uk>, www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Thanks for your comments. > I was also a bit unsure about your convention for lists of contributors. > e.g. in example A.2 > > <bib:Citable rdf:about="#Flo+Dam:JFP-ta"> > <dc:title>Linearization of... </dc:title> > <bib:contributors rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:li><marcrel:aut rdf:Resource="#Florido" /></rdf:li> > <rdf:li><marcrel:aut rdf:Resource="#Damas" /></rdf:li> > </bib:contributors> > </bib:Citable> > > Even with the "rdf:Resource" corrected to "rdf:resource" I don't think > this is valid RDF/XML. I wondered whether maybe you intend something > like: > > <bib:Citable rdf:about="#Flo+Dam:JFP-ta"> > <dc:title>Linearization of... </dc:title> > <marcrel:aut> > <rdf:Seq> > <rdf:li rdf:resource="#Florido" /></rdf:li> > <rdf:li rdf:resource="#Damas" /></rdf:li> > <rdf:Seq> > </marcrel:aut> > </bib:Citable> I have considered this syntax however, there is the requirement that contributors of different types still need to be listed in some order hence my syntax. For some reason using rdf:Resource parses with both the W3C RDF Validators and the SWI-Prolog RDF Validator however incorrect it is which has confused me. Perhaps I am trying to do too much with RDF? I need to say in the simplest way possible that there is a list of contributors: 1 marcrel:aut #XYZ 2 marcrel:ill #ABC such that they point to a foaf:Person. Can someone help me out? With the deadline looming I really would need to fix this in 24 hours. Many thanks Richard
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 09:33:35 UTC