- From: Damian Steer <damian.steer@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:26:46 +0100
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 29 Jul 2004, at 21:50, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Why isn't something's URI an IFP property of the thing? TimBL calls > that property log:uri, I think. For a while, I generalized it > slightly to u:uname [1]. > > -- sandro > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/12/uname/ "You can always solve a problem by introducing another layer of indirection." So true :-) Damian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBCWueAyLCB+mTtykRAlTTAKCLhNnSqUfIpQQ+2cR1wgMBvIhefwCg0D3+ /QRF8/AmC+HXINB+SnvJa9c= =oE9R -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 17:27:41 UTC