Hi All, I've noticed that some RDF specs (including FOAF and DOAP) use inverseFunctional properties instead of URIs to identify instance resources. I can see an instant benefit in doing this - end users don't need to worry about the problems of minting URIs, maintaining them etc.. Is this the way RDF is going - URIs for the schema, BNodes with InverseFunctional properties for the instancedata? What are the consequences? Cheers, PhilReceived on Thursday, 29 July 2004 15:32:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:50 UTC