- From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sf.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:24:38 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll writes: > > Phil Dawes wrote: > > > Hi RDF Interest, > > > > Feel free to shoot me down because I'm way out of my depth here, but I > > was wondering: > > > > Would it be possible to build a tool that could take an owl full > > ontology, infer a set of owl DL compatible assertions and then > > remove all the non-OWL DL compatible ones? > > Yes. But you need a decent set of OWL DL tools to motivate the amount of > work it would be to build such a thing. True, but it seems that despite there being a lack of DL tools, people still want to restrict themselves to OWL Lite/DL. What's your view on this subject? In the absence of DL tools, should people be targetting OWL full by default? Cheers, Phil
Received on Friday, 16 July 2004 07:30:03 UTC