- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:16:46 +0100
- To: "Graham Klyne" <gk@ninebynine.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> I'm not sure that it's really helpful, at this time, to even talk about > replacing RDF/XML syntax (whatever one may believe is actually going to > happen). I think it represents a stable foundation, or something > that can > be perceived as such, for building more interesting stuff upon. > It's clearly not going to be replaced any time soon ... I don't think we are disagreeing here. RDF/XML does have known significant weaknesses and it is important to be beginning to address those - and the TriX paper starts from the premise that that cannot be done without starting over. It is also important to appreciate the strengths of RDF/XML, which is one of the reasons I think it is important to show that you can do RDF/XML in TriX. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 27 February 2004 07:17:08 UTC