- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:52:05 +0000
- To: "www-rdf-interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
At 02:41 26/02/04 +0100, Jos De_Roo wrote: >it gives a very good feeling to read things like >http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/02/xhtml-rdf.html >:) Hey, yes! That's some nice work. Thanks for the reference. I'd like to see a nice user interface for this kind of thing built into an HTML editor :-). (It puts me in mind of a kind of "literate RDF"?) ... Anyway, to broader topics. I've been mulling over the recent discussion of Trix [1] from Jeremy and Patrick. I have been thinking that it is a worthy piece of work, but have been struggling to find a coherent view about why, after several years, we want to start talking about /another/ XML syntax for RDF. If the purpose of the existing RDF standard is to provide a single recommended way to exchange RDF between applications, then is yet another XML syntax for RDF not the last thing we want muddying the waters at this time? I've also been having some thoughts about how, now that RDF is a full Recommendation, I might be able to promote its adoption in real-world applications, which means articulating some benefits of using RDF. My thoughts have been lead in part by a comment by Brian McBride at a meeting last year, roughly: "the question we ask should not be 'how do we get (all this data) converted to RDF', but rather 'how do we bring the benefits of RDF processing to (all this data)'". I surely misquote, but I hope the intent is not damaged. Part if the value I see in Mark Birbeck's paper [2], cited by Jos, is the way it addresses this question (for XHTML). Reading Mark's paper [2] together with these other thoughts, lead me to a possible conclusion. Maybe we don't really need another stand-alone RDF/XML format, but something we can use is a way to incrementally embed RDF in existing XML documents in a way that is amenable to processing with existing XML tools, and in particular easy isolation of the RDF into some representation of its abstract syntax. I haven't looked or thought deeply enough about the technical issues, but I'm wondering if some combination of ideas from Trix [1] and "XHTML and RDF" [2] might not provide a framework for such? #g -- [1] http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2003/HPL-2003-268.html http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/jjc/tmp/trix.pdf [2] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/02/xhtml-rdf.html ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 10:55:47 UTC