- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:16:34 +0100
- To: "Victor Lindesay" <victor@schemaweb.info>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> Maybe RSS 1.0 would be suitable with some other RDF vocab terms to do > the links and picures. Yep, that'd almost certainly be the best way to go. An example of a simple feed is Nature's : http://www.nature.com/nsu/rss.rdf here's another enhanced with PRISM terms: http://nurture.nature.com/rss/nature_test.rdf Full content is usually placed in <content:encoded> literals, e.g. in http://planetrdf.com/index.rdf btw, while hunting for those links, I stumbled on this 1998 article from Dan Connolly : "The XML Revolution" http://www.nature.com/nature/webmatters/xml/xml.html Cheers, Danny.
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 07:25:37 UTC