- From: Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:47:38 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sandro Hawke wrote: | Why use XML as the syntax for describing triples instead of RDF/XML? | | (That is, why not just say [admit?] you're proposing a reification | vocabulary?) Hmmm? Their paper proposes a solution to the RDF serialization problem - -- RDF/XML is too complex, but any simple solution is too simple because for some applications it makes the RDF too difficult to write. That's very different from proposing a reification vocabulary... Cheers, - - Benja -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKpTqUvR5J6wSKPMRAg+ZAKDSMR9SzXYWz7ypP2YYP9Ajqoc6jQCgzDwO hQYYTMemyPC0LcGLp/bwBIk= =UbZF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2004 15:47:58 UTC