- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:04:09 +0200
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Adrian Walker <adrianw@snet.net>
- Cc: peter.hunsberger@gmail.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Message-id: <014c01c4e735$3bd82340$680aa8c0@IBMA4E63BE0B9E>
Hi Adrian Danny and Peter, My 2 cents There is always been a problem with people from different disciplines communicating with each other. Technical and business being just one example of a generalized problem. I do not thing the issue relates to RDF but how we present the potential of technical advancements to people with other skill sets. (The problem may be more noticeable in RDF just because it seems to attract the type of people who may have more trouble understanding what others do not understand...) Personally I am lucky to be now working with a business person who can help me translate the technical benefits into social, business or marketing terms. I think that is what you may need to be looking at is simply explaining why we are using RDF in terms that are relevant to business: Benefits verses cost, risk verses opportunity, what areas of business pain can it hope to solve, etc. you only need a one sentece overview of what RDF is and how it works. What we do not want to do is change RDF so that business department can review the details of it's development. I am wondering if a document like that, with business test cases etc, would not make a realy useful W3C deliverable. - A bit like what the EO group did for the WAI All the beat Lisa Seeman ----- Original Message ----- From: Adrian Walker To: Danny Ayers Cc: peter.hunsberger@gmail.com ; www-rdf-interest@w3.org Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 12:43 AM Subject: RDF too geeky, and what to do about it Danny, Peter -- Here are my two cents about... "I don't know if it's the semantics or what, but for some reason RDF just comes across as too geeky for the business side of the house. Maybe it's just that they've been hearing OO for 10 years and believe that "Objects" are supposed to be something good so they instantly adopt them. (Resource? What's a resource?)." The e-Government Presentation at www.reengineeringllc.com argues that RDF is way too geeky, that this will be dangerous in real world applications, and that there is something we can do about it without throwing out the RDF baby with the bathwater. That something we can do is to add some real world semantics -- far beyond the limited view of semantics as equal to type information inside all those angle brackets. The file http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RDFQueryLangComparison1.agent is an example of the approach that one can view, run and change using a browser. HTH, -- Adrian Dr. Adrian Walker Reengineering LLC PO Box 1412 Bristol CT 06011-1412 USA Phone: USA 860 583 9677 Cell: USA 860 830 2085 Fax: USA 860 314 1029
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 08:16:30 UTC