- From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:51:59 +0100
- To: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
- CC: Stefano Mazzocchi <stefano@apache.org>, Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Message-ID: <41AEF3CF.5080305@gnowsis.com>
Well I am a little "late" here, but we have a RDF context server api defined and we do these things all the time in the EPOS project http://www3.dfki.uni-kl.de/epos paper is "/Towards Goal Elicitation by User Observation/" http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/~schwarz/publikationen/index.html http://serv-4100.dfki.uni-kl.de:8000/%7Edocbase/dokana/WWW/D00000678.pdf we describe the context with an ontology (will be published 2006) and we link the context to notes, emails, etc. A small version of "context" is the usermind in www.gnowsis.org In the next gnowsis release (march, april 2006) we will publish the api. to sum it up: + Context comes from looking what the user is doing + context is documents, topics, SKOS (we use skos to describe the concepts linked to context) + time context - everything related in a timeline is related + more to come..... if you have deeper questions on context, mailto Sven Schwarz or me. cheers Leo Es begab sich aber zu der Zeit 19.11.2004 01:36, da Dirk-Willem van Gulik schrieb: > >On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > >>>I would be quite surprised if I were the only person on this planet with >>>this problem... >>> >>> > > > >>Oh, you are not. >> >> > >Aye - another +1 here. > > > >>And I have to add, context is important not only in terms of location >>(space) but also version (time). >> >> > > > >>reifications and that I think that the fact that they are not practical >>might be a matter of implementation, not of a spec. >> >> > >Implementation of some form of Context - be it source, provenance, time, >version - and beeing able to address a set of facts/triples by means of >say, the file/uri they came from, in facts makes the creation of practical >tools required for an actual operational system much easier. > > > >>I think it would be a mistake to specify what context is by harcoding >>one more metadata field to every statement. What next? what about >>licensing restrictions on the time about the change of the context of >>the statement? >> >>the queries will get hairy, agreed, but context is something you know >>when you query, what you know where you enter data is just metadata >>about statements, and that's exactly what reification is all about. >> >> > >Context is hairy - the real world is hairy - but that is not a reason not >to go out and tackle it ;) > >Dw. > > >
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2004 10:52:47 UTC