- From: Hamish Harvey <david.harvey@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:59:02 +0100
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- CC: danbri@w3.org, sandro@w3.org, macgregor@isi.edu, leo@gnowsis.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > In my published RDF files, I just assert things about the RDF/XML > serialized document. Eg. that I'm its dc:creator or foaf:maker. I > also like using a wot:assurance property to relate it to the > output of the PGP/GPG signing process. > >If I'm understanding you right Dan, your approach seems to be >the same, in essence, as named graphs, where one makes statements >about the graph, which allows one to infer things about the >statements within that graph. > > Isn't it the same in essence, except for the fact that it's polluting? When you start doing that it becomes impossible to differentiate between statements about the *graph* and statements about the *rdf document*. Cheers, Hamish
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 08:59:36 UTC